Investigating the Relationship between Manager and Shareholder Using game theory: Applying Accounting Conservatism and Financial Reporting Quality
Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government,
2021, Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 842-856
AbstractThe decision-making of managers in today's organizations is crucial due to increased complexity of internal and external influential factors and increased competition among organizations. Game theory attempts to model the mathematical behavior of a strategic situation. This situation arises when the success of one side of the game depends on the strategies selected by other side. The present study aims at finding a strategy to maximize the balance interests of managers and shareholders by applying strategic characteristics of accounting information and accounting conservatism. The statistical population of study included 132 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during a period of seven years (2012-2018). The data analysis method is inferential and SPSS software was used to prepare the data and estimate the models. Pooled data model was used to test the research hypotheses. The results of testing the research hypotheses show that the combination of strategies of manager low reporting quality-shareholder low reporting quality (m1, S1), manager high reporting quality- shareholder high reporting quality (m2, S2), manager low conservatism - shareholder low conservatism (m3, S3), manager high conservatism - shareholder high conservatism (m4, s4), were selected as poor Nash equilibrium. The study results show that game theory plays a major role in the relationship between managers and shareholders and finding equilibrium points of game can play an effective role in the decisions of game parties (managers and shareholders). Accordingly, it informs the parties of game of the strategy that has highest utility for them.
- Janafazaei N. & Hasani M. (2015), Management ownership and accounting conservatism, Strategic Management Studies, 6(21): 109-124.
- Navidi Abbaspour E. & Orhan M. (2018), Investigating the Interactive Effect of Capital Productivity and Accounting Conservatism on Capital Costs in Tehran Stock Exchange and Istanbul Stock Exchange, Productivity Management, 12(4): 213-233.
- Khodamipour A. & Panahi Gonharani R. (2017), Investigating the effect of accounting conservatism on investment efficiency in terms of information asymmetry, Financial Accounting Research, 9(3): 91-110.
- Saei M. & Lari Dasht Bayaz M. & Khadem H. (2018), Manager strategic game -Auditor: Evidence from Game Theory, Journal of Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 25(4): 497-518.
- Ronen J. & Yaari V. (2002), On The Tension between Full Revelation and Earnings Management: A Reconsideration of the Revelation Principle, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 17(4): 273-294.
- Eskandari F. & Shahi S. & Parsa A. (2013), Game Theory and Its Application in Managers' Decision Making, Shiraz: International Conference on Management, Challenges and Strategies, 13(6): 148-166.
- Basu S. (1997), "The Conservatism Principle and The Asymmetric Timeliness Earnings", Journal of Accounting & Economics, 24(2): 3-37.
- Feltham G. & Ohlson J. (1995), "Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities", Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2): 689-731.
- Givoly D. & Hayn C. (2000), "The Changing Time-Series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals: Has Financial Reporting Become More Conservative?", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3): 287-320.
- Ryan S. (2006), "Identifying Conditional Conservatism", European Accounting Review, 15(4): 511-525.
- Li F. & Shroff N. (2010), Financial Reporting Quality and Economic Growth, Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(1): 19-30.
- Asadi G. & Bayat M. (2017), The effect of conditional and unconditional conservatism accounting on company value, Management Accounting, 8(24): 1-12.
- Xu J. (2018), Relationship Between Controlling Shareholders’ Participation in Share Pledging and Accounting Conservatism in China, Australian Accounting, 14(2): 129-148.
- Arab Kiasari M. & Abdi S. (2015), Designing and analyzing the strategic game of manager-shareholder: Applying game theories, earnings management and corporate governance, Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 22(2): 221-242.
- Bashiri Manesh N. & Mehri Kamroud M. (2018), The effect of management ability on the quality of information disclosure with emphasis on conservatism, Applied Research in Financial Reporting, 7(12): 71-90.
- Rezghi Shirsavar V. & Nabavi Chashmi S. (2017), Investigating the relationship between accounting conservatism and the quality of financial reporting and efficiency of future investments and changes in the company's future debts, Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 6(24): 13-26.
- Hill C. & McDonnell B. (2015), The Agency Cost Paradigm: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, Seattle University Law Review, 38(2): 561-572.
- Wan X. (2014), Cooperation and Game between Producers and Managers Based On the Linear Contract, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 16(3): 1-7.
- Myerson Roger B. (1991), Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Games and Economic Behavior, 3(3): 387-391.
- Sun W. & Zhang J. & Li H. (2011), Research on Benefit Main Body Gambling of Stakeholders Based on Moral Element. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 19(16): 152-155.
- Abdoli G. (2011), Game theory and its applications (static and dynamic games with complete information), University Jihad Publications, 19(16): 152-155.
- Hsieh C. & Ma Z. & Novoselov K. (2019), Accounting conservatism business strategy and ambiguity, Accounting Organizations and Society, 7(4):41-55.
- Hermalin B. & Weisbach M. (2014), Understanding Corporate Governance through Learning Models of Managerial Competence, National Bureau of Economic Research, 8(4): 7-29.
- Scott J. (2003), An Introduction to Game Theory, New York: Oxford University Press, 16(5): 128-140.
- Fatemi Ardestani F. (2012), Game Principles Course, Lesson 1, Tehran: Sharif University of Technology, 15(3): 159-174.
- Meshki M. & Fattahi R. (2011), The impact of accounting conservatism on stock price fall risk, Stock Exchange Quarterly Journal, 16(4): 119-136.
- Article View: 125
- PDF Download: 148